The liver flush "works" if it is done right. I recently started taking Potassium to help me flush more often and offset the after effects of the Epsoms. It is working and I flushed 2 times in the last week and got out large stones (2") and even calcified ones.
When you feel it is time to flush, it is time to flush. Replace electrolytes, get good California olive oil and flush away!:)
See at the top how it says "Liver Flush Support Forum"? I think you're wasting your time here, you can't put the genie back into the bottle after we've seen what comes out from the flushes. You're not going to convince many of us who have benefitted and experienced the release of the stones/debris, and whatever else the liver purges during the flush.
Just don't feel like debating it with you, it's not worth it. Don't flush if you don't want to, but this is a support forum for those of us who do. Go to the debate forum.
I'm wondering if you looked very hard for this "data". Did you even read Andreas Moritz' book? Or look through the recommended messages on the forum? You are coming at this from a very basic angle of skepticism that has been addressed hundreds of times.
The OP asked if he/she should liver flush now or do something first, not if it was effective or "scientific".
Observation is the beginning of science, observe the images of what has come out after flush.
Yes, people have had x-rays before and after the flush showing them removed. Give the people who "believe" in the flush a little credit. If you are waiting around for the establishment to "prove" the LF is effective, you'll be waiting a long time. We want to get healthy and live now.
How do you know what the publishers say the stones are if you won't even take one hour and a few bucks to read the books!
By your logic, no book in the world is trustworthy because somebody made money on it. I think that is a lazy way out of ever having to learn anything new.
The stones can be gallstones, and intrahepatic (from the liver) stones as they are referred to in the medical literature found in Johns Hopkins University medical library. You would know this if you read Andreas' book.
But you haven't really looked into this enough, and didn't get the right instructions and had a half hearted flush and didn't get results and you come on here and use the word "Useless" to discourage others from doing it? I don't get you.
Your approach is the opposite of science. You don't even have enough intellectual curiosity to read a simple book, and if you did read and apply the information, you may even get some healing.
Ever heard the phrase "get out of your own way?".This is a good site http://www.liverflushtruth.blogspot.ca/