"Otherwise all there is, is a bunch of fossils showing different life forms, without any clue of how they got here until this process is discovered."

If you think that's all there is, you clearly are ignorant and uneducated. It might be a good thing that you are getting out of here because you are clearly biased.
By the way, all YOU have are fictionnal stories that were written thousands of years ago.

If you would have taken the time to read some of the "cut and paste" articles posted that explained or put forth exactly what your say was not, you would have a clearer perspective ! But instead you just babbled on trying to make us believe your fairy tale without ever considering our evidence! You came to prove your very biased views without an inkling of convincing rhetoric, without one realistic measure of your theories,whatever they may be,you never even made that clear! Yes it is time for you to move on and be done with trying to force square pegs into round holes!

You said this in an earlier post golfegg: >>>>>>>>>"I believe in evolution and big bang, it's just that God is behind it all."<<<<<<<<<<<

You believe in the evolution of animals changing into humans, or animals changing into other animals (whichever one) but only selectively. Either way I think what is really stopping you from accepting Science is your need to separate yourself from lower life forms, or your need to explain how "souls or spirits" were created. If you believe in a soul or spirit (or that you are not just an animal who is more evolved than other animals), evolution will not explain it because according to Science souls do not exist and humans are still animals. Just like you stated earlier that Science must prove "love" or "deja vu". My dog has all of the emotions that I do, and he even laughs at me, in his own way. Do you think humans have souls or spirits but animals don't? Do you believe that animals evolve? Do you think humans are animals?

The process of evolution has been discovered. Study DNA, genes, survival of the fittest, elimination of the weak, and traits passed down through generations. Watch it in real time by seeing a lion hunt the weakest zebra in the herd. If you can understand how arms can atrophy quickly if they are not used, it's not a stretch to understand "atrophied traits" and use genes/dna to explain how traits are either eliminated or passed down to the next generation over time. Evolution is not hard to understand. The proof is there, being observed by science every day because evolution is still happening, in you and in a science lab. You can see brain synapses evolving in a rat that is stimulated, and atrophying in a rat that is not.

Many breeds of dogs were created by man over the past few hundred years, so selective change is not hard to accomplish, especially over millions of years by natural selection.

You will never get your "proof" unless god himself tells you that he himself does not exist (hope you see the irony there) or god tells you that man did not evolve from bacteria. This is what happens when you have conflicting belief systems, god and science. I think you need to pick one or the other, god or science. I chose science without god, and it leaves me with more questions the more I study it. It leaves a healthy attitude towards the unknown, and I have no need to delude myself into trying to be omniscient about the world I live in, or be connected to something that is.

Golfegg, you say are Urantian. What logic do you use to accept Urantian beliefs that there are other worlds and that humans are destined to EVOLVE into spirit beings based on:

"During the 1920's and 1930's, a Chicago psychiatrist, Dr. W.S. Sadler (1875-1969) became very interested in an unusual case. Sadler had been asked to examine a patient after the patient's wife noticed he was talking in his sleep, and seemed to be speaking for various super-mortal personalities, called revelators. The name of the patient has been kept secret and the exact manner of communication is not clear. However, Dr. Sadler insisted that this process did not involve spiritualism, channeling, or automatic writing. The contact personality was entirely unconscious (asleep) during the transmission, and had little or no interest in the process when awake. From these sessions emerged The Urantia Book. The material that eventually became the Urantia Book was received during the years 1934-35."

How is a 1920's mental patient more credible on evolution than the many many modern scientists releasing scientific studies done with genes/dna, new fossil discoveries... How can you accept that humans evolve into spirit beings because some psychiatrist heard his patient mumbling it in his sleep, but you can't accept the vast seperate evolutionary conclusions of chemistry, biology, paleontology, etc...? What was it exactly that made you agree with Urantians?