Cesium user results 
ikota
17 y
11,058
RN
I had a PET/CAt scan done recently and discovered that whatever was remaining of my cancer after the operation is gone. My therapy included using Cesium for a month and a half as well as drinking Ozone water and an occasional Ozone sauna (not too many of those though). I had a sarcoma of the lung and the doctor wasn' able to remove it all, which he proposed numerous times to fix later, coming to my hospital room. I was refusing every time because he explained that he'd have to remove part of my diaphragm, phrenic nerve which from what I understood controls the mobility of the diaphragm and some more lung tissue. That seemed like a lot of hacking away at my tender young flesh. Besides I was hoping that the Cesium treatment would fix up whatever was remaining. My operation was September 15th and a 10 centimeter tumor was removed. Now, almost to the day 4 months later the full body PET/CAT scan showed no cancer anywhere.
- Re: Cesium user results UserX
17 y
4,041
- Re: Cesium user results woody7
17 y
4,018
This is a reply to # 820,353i am very happy for you,
you are an inspiration to alot of sick people proving that hard work pays off
all the best,
Lou - Congratulations! What great news!! n... joy1975
17 y
3,886
- Re: Congratulations! What great news... ikota
17 y
4,028
- Re: Congratulations! What great news... ikota
17 y
4,028
- Re: Cesium user results Tegandra
17 y
3,997
MoreThis is a reply to # 820,353What wonderful news! I reeally needed to hear a story like yours right now. Kind of gave me a boost and added a bit more hope:)
- Re: Cesium user results Luigis
17 y
3,938
MoreThis is a reply to # 820,353This is sooo good ! Congratulations for your perseverence and courage ! My best, Luigi
- Re: In the interest of truth ikota
17 y
4,103
This is a reply to # 823,921
Ok, a couple side-notes on the great news 4 months ago. Cesium appears to be effective in staving off the growth of tumor WHILE it's being implemented. However if the underlying cause of cancer remains as soon as the Cesium is stopped the tumor returns. Learned the hard truth on my own skin. I stopped Cesium around November December of 2006 (causes pretty severe diarrhea once you reach your maximum), and now in April of 2007 I have a tumor as large as the previous one, which was pretty large plus a smaller one alongside it. That is Extremely fast growth rate. I'm restarting Cesium while thinking about my options. This time I think I'll have a more sensitive meter of how well it works as I've since developed a pretty annoying ache at the tumor site. So if that stops in the designated 3 days I'll know Cesium is worth another shot.- Re: In the interest of truth patientadvocate
16 y
4,001
This is a reply to # 858,206Hi,
Thanks for clarifying your situations.
Take cesium with food always. Devide doses into three or four dosings. Use immodium ad when you take cesiuim. These things should help tolerances.
Sarcoma is very fast growing. It can spread through lymph and venous system.
Yeah, cesium chloride can be taken as a vitamin once you feel your cancer is near remission. Lowering the dosage for long term use is not a bad idea.
The cesium protocols also call for additional adjuncts. Are you using these adjuncts? If not would you like to see those protocols.
Have you researched vitamin c infusions? %70 success rate.
Have you researched ESSIAC? This concoction actually contains four or five different kinds of oxygen donors along with some highly alkaline metalic salts.
The oxygen donors in Essiac are oxalates, polyphenols, chlorophyll, mineral oxides, quinones.
The original promoters of this therapy have a wonderful book out. The doctor actually treated his own cancer with this group of herbs. He used no other treatments.
Read my postings about cancer being anaerobic and don't be passive about your disease. Several cheap, inexpensive therapies can be started immediately.
DMSO is a great oxygen therapy. It's so cheap it is not funny. Contains sulphur compounds that bind to and then release O2.
Above all! Don't wait. Please contact me for specific protocols if you are going to take on a fighter's outlook! I have seen so many wonderful outcomes to cancer using oxygen or ph therapies. Vitamin c infusions have been pretty successful too.
Bret Peirce, licensed nurse, author of the "Peirce Postulate."- Re: In the interest of truth MsUnique
16 y
3,826
This is a reply to # 1,225,291
Bret,
I read your response regarding: "The cesium protocols also call for additional adjuncts. Are you using these adjuncts? If not would you like to see those protocols".
I am interested in those adjuncts and protocols and wondered if you could give me that information.
I have a friend who was recently diagnosed with Advanced Prostate Cancer! He is interested in using
Cesium and Potassium.Your website says not to take Cesium & Potassium together. How far apart should they be taken?
I notice that there are many types of Potassium. Is one type more preferable than the other type?
Thank You for your assistance,
MsUnique
- Re: In the interest of truth patientadvocate
16 y
3,922
This is a reply to # 1,227,692Great question.
Two hours apart. Potassium is part of the cesium protocol and neccessary. Also, the protocol calls for zinc, iron, selenium, silver, copper salts. Again using oxides, citrates , or sulphates as the cat ion salt.
Organic molasses and black strap molasses have more potassium for your buck than anything else you can buy.
Supplements should be potassium citrate, potassium oxide, potassium sulfate.
DO not use potassium chloride.
Vitamin A is part of cesium protocols, 150,000 per day x 3 days then 50,000 iu.
twice daily. Dirt cheap.
DMSO also is a must. Please read the DMSO literature. It's been proven to actually turn cancer into normal cells without cell death,(which is toxic.)
Dirt cheap it is and you can buy it at feed store. Rub it on abdomen and thighs,not using latex or rubber gloves. Must be by hand only. Sulphur allergies beware!!!
Remember, cancer is a race. Start what you can today. Vitamin c buffered form, vitamin a, dmso, chlorophyll, are wonderful adjuncts and all cost very little and can be started today, while waiting for cesium protocols and supply.
Bret
- Re: In the interest of truth patientadvocate
16 y
3,922
- Re: In the interest of truth MsUnique
16 y
3,826
- Re: In the interest of truth patientadvocate
16 y
4,001
- Re: In the interest of truth ikota
17 y
4,103
- Re: Cesium user results Chris12
11 y
2,016
This is a reply to # 820,353Wow, sounds great.
What did the doc say after that?!!!
Here's some info I've been posting on the forums lately which provides a bit more info on Cesium Chloride for those who might be interested, or those who might think that it's toxic.
According to Wikipedia Cesium Chloride has a relatively LOW toxicity.
The worst thing about cesium chloride is that it seems to cause a potassium deficiency which may explain some of the side effects in some who have used it (such as heart arrythmia). This is easily remedied by supplementing with potassium while on cesium treatment.
Here's some more info and some positive studies on the effectiveness and low toxicity of cesium chloride:
"Caesium chloride has a low toxicity to human and animals.[60] Its median lethal dose (LD50) in mice is 2300 mg per kilogram of body weight for oral administration and 910 mg/kg for intravenous injection.[61] The toxicity of CsCl is related to its ability to lower the concentration of potassium in the body and partly substitute it in biochemical processes.[62]" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesium_chloride#Toxicity
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=6522428
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6522427
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6522424
VERY IMPORTANT TO READ THIS LINK BELOW (DEALS WITH BRAIN CANCERS AND MORE DETAILS THAT ARE VERY IMPORTANT IN GENERAL):
http://www.cancertutor.com/Cancer/Alkaline.html
Apparently the liquid form of cesium chloride is more bioavailable (easily absorbed by the body), compared to the older powdered forms. But if you only check out one link in the comment, check out the one from cancer tutor (above).- Re: Cesium user results Chris12
11 y
2,026
This is a reply to # 2,073,426ps. Ikota, if possible, try to convince your doctor to rather use MRI scans on you if possible. MRI's are much safer than CT scans and CAT scans, and are often just as effective.
As per Wikipedia:
"The use of X-rays, a type of ionizing radiation, by a computed tomography (CT) allows for examination of tissues composed of elements of a higher atomic number than the surrounding tissues. MRI, in contrast, uses non-ionizing radio frequency (RF) signals to acquire images and is best suited for soft tissue (although MRI can also be used to visualize bones, teeth[62] and even fossils[63]).
Since CT scans use ionizing RADIATION (X-rays) to produce images, there is a risk of damage to DNA that can subsequently cause CANCER...Unlike CT, MRI does not use ionizing radiation, although it is associated with other risks.[65]" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_resonance_imaging#MRI_versus_CT
CT scans and CAT scans both use X-RAYS.
- Re: Cesium user results Chris12
11 y
2,026
- Re: Cesium user results UserX
17 y
4,041
fetched in 0.0469 sec, IP =172.70.126.65, y=1