There is ample evidence for the protocol. People have seen the immediate arresting or remediation of symptoms following some particularly successful flushes. It is not necessary to try and explain every piece of supposed contradictory evidence that is presented. We do not know the motivation or credibility of every investigator who submits evidence on this board or anywhere else in the world. We choose who we will trust, based on the weight of evidence on balance and our personal intuition, and then we self-experiment. We do believe in individuality, and this protocol which may be a success for some, may not be for others.
The people might be more open to your evidence, if you took your imperious certitude away. It is not persuasive to the enlightened and I daresay it is not a good attitude for Science or for life (and isn't that what we are all after here?)