Well the doctor I talked to about it had seen EC. And I explained what it did and she did not see the logic in it. And every other derm has agreed. So I'm just saying that maybe there is a reason for that.
And yes the year kind of does matter. A doctor isnt going to take a report that is 60 years old as seriously as they would a recent report. Because it hasn't been proven in 60 years. It's been around for 60+ years and we have yet to hear another report about it working for others.
And like I said, just because it helped people in a case study doesn't mean much. I have read tons of case reports about treatments that haven't worked for other people.
Yes, it's intriguing and it would be worth trying, but I'm just saying that perhaps there is a reason why no derm thinks its logical to try.