Back in 2018 the WHO accepted the old anti- parasite medication Ivermectin as a treatment for Scabies based on meager evidence. Scabies causes itch and a rash, not a deadly pandemic.
Today the WHO is still opposed to the use of Ivermectin for COVID-19 even though their own consultant, Dr Hill, reported a 75% reduction in death in his meta analysis of various studies from around the world !
Dr. Kory, a former med school prof and leader of the FLCCC association of emergency medicine doctors explains the situation in this clip and presents the meta analysis data. https://youtu.be/xy85K1hENn4?t=1793
Dr Lawrie presents the meta analysis from the WHO's own consultant, Dr Hill in this clip. Meta analysis from Dr Lawrie's group concluded Ivermectin caused a 68% reduction in death. https://youtu.be/IQkoL2l3-gg?t=524
This meta analysis reports a greater than 80% improvement when Ivermectin was used early in the disease. https://ivmmeta.com/
You won't hear about this from sources that are funded by Big Pharma. They have too much to lose if a cheap, old, safe, Nobel winning medication is adopted widely. Emergency use authorization could be removed for expensive treatments. The risk-benefit analysis for the experimental vaccines changes when there is a rather effective treatment. Dr Chris Martenson explains in greater detail here https://www.peakprosperity.com/private-profits-vs-public-health/
Remember if people with a relevant PhD write things on social media that is contrary to the WHO's position they may be censored.
Med school professor Peter McCullough who is editor of two medical journals and the most published person in his medical specialty in the world had his Youtube video taken down. It was describing a paper he and a group of doctors from around the world had published in a medical journal about treatments for outpatients. https://youtu.be/QAHi3lX3oGM?t=161