One could argue that these so called transitional fossils are nothing more than unique species. It is not a transitional fossil, just because someone says so, or a bunch of google eyed evolutionists agree and say so in a "peer reviewed" journal.
We have many examples today of very similar, in fact, once thought to be same species being broken out into separate groups due to a finding of unique DNA or frequency.
I try to keep an open mind when it comes to creation/evolution discussions. If I had to say I leaned one way or the other, it would be towards evolution; probably because I worked in a genetics lab and studied biology along with evolution in college. However, neither process, creation nor evolution has enough evidence for me. Or better yet, I lack any understanding.
Like the previous poster, I do not think man was meant to understand everything; at least not in the way we are trying to understand it. I think we turned right instead of left and are barking up the wrong tree so to speak.
Like the nature of these forums, I think that all we need for health and prosperity has been provided for us and right in front of us all along, but our egos propel us towards self destruction, pulling a great deal of the world and its inhabitants along with us. It is the way of things...