CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: language police!
just_peachy Views: 4,562
Published: 19 years ago
This is a reply to # 529,636

Re: language police!

Actually, I didn't contrive those definitions, Webster did. Sorry to disappoint you. Nowhere in the (adjective) definition does it state that one *is* homosexual by being attracted to one's own sex, simply that the "attraction" is a homosexual one. One who has both homo and hetero attractions would, by definition, have bisexual attractions. One who acts sexually with members of both their own and opposite sexes would then be leading a bisexual life-style.

However, one may claim (noun) homosexual/bisexual/heterosexual as a label if one cares to solidify their sexual preferences into their personal identity.

I happen to believe we are so much more than simply whatever label someone, even Webster, puts on our sexual actions and attractions. Labels are restricting, confining, and are used quite frequently for lazy prejudging in place of individual thought.

Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2022

1.328 sec, (1)