CureZone   Log On   Join

Typical misunderstanding. by befurther ..... Christianity Debate

Date:   6/9/2012 12:07:09 PM ( 9 years ago ago)
Hits:   2,399

1 of 1 (100%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

Your arguement is based on an invalid preface.

"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.  The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters." (Genesis 1:1-2)

Consider the following.

Not to mention your "rediculous" as you put it.

Man's tool of classification is simply an attachment of belief.

That is it is religion like the belief in evolution which is based on fiath in evidence presented.

Here is a quote from the University of Waikato you refered to.

"Plants and animals both owe their origins to endosymbiosis, a process where one cell ingests another, but for some reason then fails to digest it."

Note the term used...but for some reason. This means that all information derived in such context is based on faith in previous related work and yet their is mystery and uncertainty in the said theory.

The Article continues to state speculation as fact...this is not scientific, because we know for a fact that the information regarding evolution is theory and while there is evidence, the  600 million year timeline, etc. has not been verified by rigorous experimentaion,  that would take 600 million years to prove beyond the shadow of a doubt.

In Short:

The information and theory are only as good as the words used to communicate them.

The fact that you had to placed your underhanded assumption of inbreeding into your premise says it all, Your argument is moot when it is integrated with a manufactured (straw man)insult.


<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.11 sec, referred by