Nanoparticles kill cancer 
JesichasHope
6 y
1,633
† Cross †
MoreSeveral researchers around the world are trying to develop nanoparticle encased sensitizers, because they target cancer far more specifically. We have already achieved that goal with our present sensitizer. While it is not difficult to create nanoparticles, it is quite difficult to control their size and how they aggregate and assemble. It is also important to control how well the nanoparticles penetrate cancer cells. We use a nanoparticle that enhances the sensitizer uptake. Other researchers are working with gold nanoparticles, because it is the easiest nanoparticle to make, but ask yourself this, does cancer have a desire for gold bling ? Probably not, your girl friend may like gold, but cancer prefers sugar. Our nanoparticles look like Sugar to the cancer.
You can learn more on their patient site: http://www.ourcancerspot.com
More
- What does PDT have to do with nanopa... Dquixote1217
6 y
1,670
This is a reply to # 2,414,045I am a bit confused by the site the link takes me to - it's a clinic in the Phillipines shich has a protocol called the "Cyotluminator's Philippine Protocol" that uses "photo-dynamic therapy (PDT), but makes no mention on the opening page of nanoparticles.
Evidently, the guy who wrote the material developed "my new cancer sensitizing chemical: and uses lasers to illuminate cancer and non-cells and describes their protocol which supposedly results in the death of every single cancer cell and the prevention of it every returning as:
"So this is the focus, the central theme, of everything we do. First, kill the main part of the cancer in a special way that alerts the immune system to the cancer as an enemy. Second, support the immune system with a variety of vitamins, special alkalizer compounds and several phytochemicals ( a fancy word for plant extracts ). Third, disable the cancers ability to make food using a very advanced non-toxic chemical which inhibits glycolysis and at the same time disable cancers ability to resist the immune system."
Maybe so - but after all the years and all the cancer cure claims, I a natural skeptic and statements such as this one do no allay my skepticism at all:
"The reason that boosting your immune system will not defeat cancer is because your immune system does not recognize cancer as an enemy. We use several immune boosting meds nearly all of which are herbal or a food substance, but we know it will only slow down the cancer, can only end it in very early cases and even then it usually comes back."
Not sure I agree 100% with that. I believe that you can defeat cancer and keep it from returning using natural items and a healthy anti-cancer diet and lifestyle. The immune system, especially a healthy one, recognizes and defeats cancer/abnormal cells constantly. I would hope that a person who successfully uses the treatment/protocol would continue to pay attention to a healthy Diet and lifestyle and some key supplementation rather than believe that they will never have cancer return. Maybe the protocol believes the same, since it says (or implies) that each treatment is only for the type of cancer being treated and does not insure that other cancers will not come along - as could well be the case if a person does not keep their immune system strong and does n ot eliminate and avoid toxins (which they obviously had not done previously since they got toxins and toxins are far and away the number one cause of cancer).
It could be that the treatment works wonders just as described. For my money, and my life, I will live and eat relatively healthily and take a single preventive capsule of the potent immune booster/modulator and cancer fighter Oleander extract plus some regular curcumin and a superior all-around nutitional product and be confident of keeping cancer at bay. And if I were someone who had cancer, I would use a natural anti-cancer protocol to defeat it and then take the same preventive measures to make sure it does not return.
Say, is the guy slowing down? He says early on that in 2005 he threw himself into studying cancer 14 hours a day, 7 days a week. Then towards the end he says:
"I have spent 9 years, 12 hours a day six days a week researching this and I have gone through 30,000 research papers on cancer treatment, both conventional cancer treatment and all other options, herbal, complementary, natural and a combination of all of them, with a main focus on photo-dynamic therapy."
He might want to clarify that a bit. But hey, slowing down I can understand, as alas I am no longer young and immortal. I used to go 16 -20 hours a day regularly. Could not even dream of doing that today.
Maybe you can give some more details? Looks like you have gone in a whole different direction from the last time I heard from you. It's been awhile though . . .
My best,
Tony
More
- Re: What does PDT have to do with na... JesichasHope
6 y
1,450
This is a reply to # 2,414,229I continually expand my research, Tony. It is a never ending journey.
While I will agree prevention is number 1, most people get themselves into a situation and then want to get out of it fast. Cancer took a long time coming so it is not as easy as One Two Three. As Thomas Seyfried notes, it is not easy to with a strict lifestyle if you are in the mindset of most people wanting meals fast and on the go and use products chemically produced because they are convenient and marketed well to make us think we have to have them. So the result is damage to our cells and cancer as a possibility. Charlotte Gerson tells us we need balance and harmony so we don't get sick. Again, most won't do it and get sick. Gerson's therapy may work but how many do it 100 percent and she mentions doing it less then 100 percent gives way to failures.
The fellow in the Philippines spent a lot of time and money on his research. He discovered the use of nano particles, making his solutions into nano size gives the ability to get them into cancer cells rather than to work from outside them. Doing so he is able to stop mitosis and kill the cells. While that in itself sounds easy, it is not. He has accomplished his goal to kill any cancer anywhere.
Survival long term is always dependent upon the patient, much like what Charlotte Gerson has said, if the patient begins the fight for surviving after going through a lot of drug, surgeries and radiation therapies it is harder on the body to overcome the onslaught of side effects, many of them deadly. You can be a genius and find a way to kill cancer but if you don't find a way to help people overcome the side effects of previous treatments you are blamed.
You mentioned what does nano particles have to do with PDT? Well everything. PDT - Photo Dynamic Therapy - works on using a sensitizer that is activated with a light. Most PDT's use chlorin E6 which is not strong enough and works from around the cells, they then use lights that are UV lights and some even say you can go into the sun to get the effect. The light can only reach layers down but not deep into the body where most cancer grows. When the researcher began his quest to find a way to kill cancer, he spent years developing a sensitizer that will go into the cells using nano particles; getting into the cancer cells only,leaving healthy cells alone; then using lights that are designed to have specific light waves matched to react with the frequency of the sensitizer to kill off cancer cells. The immune system sees this massive reaction and creates antibodies against what it is seeing in the blood stream, much like what occurs when we have a virus.
I cannot vouch for the amount of time he spends on researching today, I know if I bring him a complex problem from an unusual case he will take hours, days and weeks, sometimes sleepless nights on some cases to try and bring about a solution. A young mom with liver failure from chemotherapy was saved after his intervention. So, he works a lot but when you have Science in your blood it is hard to stop.
He gets a lot of threats and a lot of postings of scams and what not, I have too just by association but like Rife, Gerson, and many others who made breakthrough, making others nervous they too were called charlatans, scammers, liars and quacks, run out of town or worse. It's risks we all take each day we try to keep people alive from cancer or tell them how to prevent it.
Keep in touch.
- Re: What does PDT have to do with na... JesichasHope
6 y
1,450
- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer User X
6 y
1,489
- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer JesichasHope
6 y
1,472
This is a reply to # 2,414,403Well Mr X your intention is of course to dissuade others from using this treatment and in the course to discredit a man through lies; nothing has changed in centuries where a man makes an incredible discovery that could change the course of history, science, religion... and is killed, discredited, run out of town, or country.
This man cannot save everyone, he cannot perform miracles. 96 percent of all people that go to him or any other clinic for that matter have already done countless rounds of chemo and radiation, had body parts cut out and off; then expect an alternative treatment to make them miraculously whole again. No one screams scam at oncologists for using poisons known not to work. No one goes back to any doctor after their loved one dies to tell them what a failure the doctor was. But for all those using non-invasive treatments from Mexico, to Germany, to Russia, Italy, Singapore, China and the Philippines people expect perfection when presented with terminal patients often too weak to stand. Bless every one of them for trying. And most charge a fraction of what an oncologist makes on one patient in one month; so go tell your oncologist you want a refund when your loved one dies. My daughter's bills were over two million dollars fighting TNBC; we spent just over 40 thousand with alternatives. The oncologist wasn't going to give back a dime.
We are not afraid of you link, it is clearly posted on our site to bring people's attention to the false news. Posted with untruths. The patients shown have their own personal stories, what went on with them and why they died had nothing to do with his failure but everything to do with previous conditions, they all knew the risks and took them. The poster has an agenda and motive; we are well aware of who.
He has treated hundreds over the years, mostly terminal patients and has lost about twenty percent. Everyone in the world would love 100 percent but that is fantasy. Oncologist lose nearly all of patients, that my friend is where people should concentrate their anger.
For anyone's one interest the link to the truth behind the lies told: http://www.jesichashope.org/transparent.html
- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer User X
6 y
1,384
- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer JesichasHope
6 y
1,407
This is a reply to # 2,415,433Who ever you are apparently you are a lover of true fake news and have no idea of immigration laws.
This man was from the USA and immigrated to Australia, in doing so a FBI report must be made to enter. His report show NO ARRESTS OR CONVICTIONS EVER MADE. His work as a scientist in the USA required traveling world-wide and he had to have security clearance for his work. Again - this means NO ARRESTS AND NO CONVICTIONS.
The newspaper article is a rag paper - so if you believe in two headed toads and aliens living next door from the Enquirer in the US then I guess you are gullible enough to believe anything. The false news was given to this young reporter who just copied it and never investigated it because rags have a disclaimer that says they don't research anything for truth, they just print it.
If you look at our disclosure page you will see the actual FBI evidence that proves it is all fake.
http://www.jesichashope.org/transparent.html
Anyone else that reads this crap needs to get smart and not play the slander game.- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer User X
6 y
1,396
This is a reply to # 2,415,496I thought that you were Jesicha, I didn't know you were using someone else's story to get your $5000 kick back for each person you send to have PDT. You want to give someone Hope why don't you find something that people can afford, most can't afford $35k. Why don't you ask that person that developed PDT to get on curezone and teach how to do the PDT at home, where to get the PDT so they can do it at home. But there wont be any money in that and you wont get your $5000 kick back then right? Start a PDT forum where people can talk about it and share ideas if it really works. Who do you think you're fooling? That c**ks****r that developed PDT is not gonna get up on here on curezone. Send him my post.
- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer User X
6 y
1,398
- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer User X
6 y
1,396
- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer JesichasHope
6 y
1,407
- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer User X
6 y
1,384
- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer JesichasHope
6 y
1,472
- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer jaguar57
6 y
1,767
This is a reply to # 2,414,045Cancer is not a tumor so nanoparticles are just a stop-gap measure. When you kill one tumor then another one appears. why? Because you didn't kill the cancer. Let me define cancer correctly. It is the biochemical imbalance in the body that allow tumors to grow. We all produce cancer cells but most peoples immune system kill them before they develop into tumors. read more at http://www.dragonfly75.com/eng/cancer.html
- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer JesichasHope
6 y
1,471
This is a reply to # 2,414,757Cancer is a reaction or a result of certain factors, usually toxins, bacteria and viruses that come together to create a perfect storm within the body. It is a symptom of something very wrong going on inside.
Tumors are cells that have mutated due to damage to healthy cells withing the mitochondria.
When you treat cancer with solutions made into nano particles such as the scientist we are discussing you are reaching into every cancer cell, even the stem cells responsible for metastases. And you are killing them. When you use the 4th Generation PDT as discussed you are creating an immune response which creates antibodies against the cancer just killed off. Any stray cell will be killed off by the immune system at that point forward.
You then rebuild and repair the body so it is clean and in balance, when the body is in harmony dis- ease does not exist.
One must also understand once the body has been exposed to chemotherapy and radiation there is dna damage done and you must use support the organs damaged, also new cancer can be created from the damage to the body.
Treating it is not always cut and dry like some want to believe.
- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer JesichasHope
6 y
1,471
- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer User X
6 y
1,440
This is a reply to # 2,414,045What Nanoparticles are in the Xgly drink? You expect people to drink it not knowing what is in it? Give me a list of the ingredients and a certificate of analysis. I can't afford the 35k, where can poor people like me buy it online? What testing has been done on it?
- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer jaguar57
6 y
1,620
This is a reply to # 2,415,527$35,000 !!!??? I got rid of cancer in my body for less than 1% that cost. see mt story at http://www.dragonfly75.com/eng/mytreatments.html
- Re: Nanoparticles kill cancer jaguar57
6 y
1,620
- What does PDT have to do with nanopa... Dquixote1217
6 y
1,670
fetched in 0.0664 sec, IP =108.162.216.170, y=1