Re: What's your view on KOLBRIN Bible??

Good points all-language continuity,source of initial story and promotion.
Flowing from only one source,the text is not mentioned anywhere else ever. The Scriptures certainly do not refer to it.
Advertising on George Noory,this Kimball stands to make a churchful of money for this recent publication.
Does it smell of Joseph Smith's Mormon tablets,found in an area where later hundreds of other prehistoric copper financial plates were found?
Are you reminded of Nicholas Notovich'discovery of the Jesus story in India? Confirmed by Meier,IndoJesus is still a foggy story even with other so called evidence.
You have a solo source of a monumental discovery-anyone for bigfoot in a freezer?
You have the entire volume coming through an elderly sage who edited emendations.
Studying Pseudepigrapha and Apocrypha at San Jose State,I learned,lesser historians
attached their names to mystical stories for believablilty,vainglory and philosophy.
Also,you find in the pseudepigrapha, that Mohammedans have written the story. The episodes will enlighten you on background to well known biblical persons and parables,until you read the koran's version of the Scripture,imbedded in the story.
Needing better scholarship,Kolbrin is fanciful but does not pass the smell test.